IceDragon64's movie Reviews on Newgrounds

[The Army Executioner-P.1]

This has some effort and potential, but needs work.

the Sound is OK and the music is good.
The animation is limited and uninspiring but does the job.
The plot etc is simple but quite thoughtful. Is there a connection between the intro story and the rest of it? The artwork with those building looks good though slightly fuzzy, then its just matchstick men, which is a disappointment.

What really bugged me is that the text is so hard to read. Most came up dark with the dark man in front of it. I tried 3 times to read it, finally reading most of it, including the spelling mistake.

MattmanProductionsTM responds:

Right, I am definatley doing a remake. Please review and see how you like it then. It should be submitted by the 20th of may or earlier. Thanks for the review.

[Dock Division Revival]

OK. I saved this one for old time's sake, but No, I will blam anything else that comes through like this from this revival. I will give you a usable review so you know I am not just being a hater:
1. No button to get back to menu from each one.
2. Carrot's was OK, but Banana was dreadful art, animation, sound -everything and you know it.
3. Spell revival correctly, only the CC get away with crap spelling cos they are CC.
4. the Docks specialised in a small number of movies with some quality to them, including using 3D, camera angles and a better type of voice than crappy Speakonia.

Whoever you are, I suggest if you are at all serious, that you contact the old Docks and ask if you can work with them to make a proper revival.

Look them up on Wikigrounds if you want to know more about them.

Anyhow, I would like to see some good new Dock material, so do go for it!

[The Moleman]

Hm, not a very nice subject; creepy. However, in terms of its artistic skill etc, its good quality- sound art, animation , voice etc.

I suppose its supposed to be funny and I don't find it funny, but Newgrounds will probably love it!

[Sweet Brown Fire Cartoon]

Good sound, animation, art etc.

Its all good enough, except I can't hear the last things the "good " guy says. I tried it twice, but its silent.

The guys talk sounds familiar. I try to make sure I vote on artistic merit, not just what will get the most points.

StringAnime responds:

The Good guy mouths the words WTF. I don't like to swear so reading his lips will have to sufice.

[Whistle Walk]

Yes. I was, of course about to blam it to hell, then, OK ! Its mildy amusing with good voices and effects. Nothing great by itself, but its OK. Good enough sound, art animation etc.

[So Who You Gonna Call 2]

Yeah! I like this!
Like many other people, I thought the original number was some kind of joke at first, which is a shame. I wouldn't call it cos I'm in UK and its expensive and I don't have much to say.

I watched it through and it was OK, so-so etc. until the subtitles, then HAHAHAHAHA !

It was all very neatly done, with good animation and sound, then obviously some effort went into the subtitles.
Check the messages- we just sent one!

Dosensuppen responds:

The subtitles were the most crucial piece. Putting it up, we knew that it would be the comedy act.

[The Birth]

Star of David?

I assume you have gathered by now that the image you are presumably looking for is a star with FIVE points. I am intrigued by the "unicorn" horn, but unlike other reviewers, I don't assume it is "wrong"

Its good material, but it doesn't tell us much. It doesn't have any personality in it- we cannot get a feel for this character as we don't know anything about him.

As a test of techniques etc, I would say it has much potential, but as it is, I don't think its that great.