Score: 6

"It has a bit of atmosphere"

submission: Cat Eyes 777 ~``~

date: March 24, 2007

Since the primary function of NG Audio is for use in subs, you should always put the track length in the notes.

Although I don't think this is musically very special, I could imagine using it or an extended version of it.

Sorry, I have no idea what goes into making this computer music. For all I know you just pressed a few buttons and the computer made it all up. I have no idea how original it is of its kind, most people in the world don't!

Score: 6

"Change the title"

submission: "0 Voters" Must Dieeeeeeeeeee!

date: March 24, 2007

You made your point, now move on. Unlike other music sites, the primary point of NG Audio is for use in submissions. This may be a usable short loop, somehow. So change the title to something which grabs an authors and sums up its style/atmosphere.
There's nothing wrong with it and I would quite like to hear it in the right place on a sub so yeah- 6/10 =3/5

Score: 7

"Nice enough"

submission: Tribute to Fuego (RL crew)

date: March 24, 2007

I'm not sure why you asked me to five your stuff. Did you just ask everyone who has ever PM'ed you? The music is OK, there's nothing wrong with it 7/10 is pretty high for me, but I just reduced your score.
You went on in your PM and in your notes about words that mean nothing to me. Ive never heard of Fuego and I don't know what dnb is.
All I would say about the music is its got a bit of detail and development in it, but its good it wasn't longer cos it was getting repetative.
As for the 0 person- so few people vote in the Audio section the score is pretty meaningless. Read the reviews and learn from them, look for downloads and use in submissions. Don't ask for fives, ask for honest reviews, its more satisfying in the end.
Best Wishes,
Ice

Score: 6

"Is this Trance?"

submission: River remix

date: January 28, 2007

I think it would need a beat for Trance. Its Ambience. Its OK stuff. Maybe good for dreamlike images.

Score: 6

"Good but..."

submission: voiceloop-hum

date: January 28, 2007

You have to cut out that faint talking in the space!

Score: 8

"Beautiful voice"

submission: 4 second angel vocies

date: January 28, 2007

simple but showing great potential. I don't know what one would do with this, but somehow it seems very usable. I will look for an oportunity.

Score: 4

"Basic"

submission: greenheart--

date: January 28, 2007

Not much to this one. Didn't grab me, even your voice wasn't enough and the keyboard thing was too basic. You might think of removing this one and maybe replacing it with an improved version. Best Wishes,

Score: 5

"Potential but..."

submission: pan's dance

date: November 19, 2006

Its too bitty for my taste. It starts off with one thing, then jumps to something else, then goes on without holding a proper rhythm. I cannot picture Pan dancing to this, and yet as I said in the summary, it does have potential, redone.

Score: 5

"Has potential but..."

submission: harp whales

date: November 19, 2006

I don't like the gaps/sudden changes in it. You must be able to sort this thing out. It sounded nice, then all went wrong.

Score: 5

"Hmm."

submission: stairwell song

date: November 19, 2006

Beautiful sound, of course, but you overuse the echo. It comes into a lot of your stuff, I think too much. With good equipment you can vary it quite a bit, I don't know what you use to record your stuff. In this case, it means that I cannot hear the lyrics, which with a title like that, one would definately want to hear what its about. How about uploading a version without the echo. Its the most interesting title you've got here.